Mad Scientist Works For Greenhouse Heating Independence Down To -25F

My friends have called me many things—some complimentary and some not so much—but perhaps my finest moment came when a dear friend referred to me as me a “Mad Scientist.”

Having spent 20 years working as a communications engineer, it seemed only natural that when I retired I would finally go fishin’ or travel. But no…. I built a lab where I could do solar energy research related to growing food in a self-contained environment.

I guess once an engineer, always an engineer!

Soaring Raven Laboratory

Soaring Raven Laboratory (SRL) is located in south central Colorado near the foot of the Spanish Peaks at an elevation of 7,000 feet above sea level. The high country climate has dry, warm summers with daily temperatures in the upper 80’s to low 90’s, followed by long, snowy winters.

While it is not uncommon for winter temperatures to drop well below zero, Colorado is blessed with 265 or more sunny days a year, making it an ideal location for testing solar energy applications and conducting related research.

The goal of SRL is to act as a platform for small-scale solar energy research and education by focusing on low-cost, effective, and sustainable grassroots solutions for residential energy needs.

The Greenhouse Lab

The lab was built around a self-contained 12’ x 24’ greenhouse that has the ability to obtain all of its energy requirements from the sun by the integration of both passive and active solar energy systems. It was constructed in the late fall of 2013 and became operational in December of that same year on the winter solstice.

In designing and locating the greenhouse, there were a number of issues that needed to be overcome. The first was the placement of the greenhouse on a city lot already occupied by a home, detached studio/office, and 10’ x 20’ shed.

To complicate matters, the entire south end of the existing residence was covered by solar collectors, so shading from the SRL greenhouse was a major concern.

However, after careful planning and some compromise, the site was selected and a greenhouse sprouted from the earth!

The electrical power to operate the lab’s ventilation, circulating pumps, and lighting systems comes from an array of solar panels. During sunny days, excess power that’s not needed in the lab is stored in a battery bank to operate an active hot-air solar furnace for the house and provide a limited amount of power for after-hours lighting.

The water required for the greenhouse is a combination of municipal-provided and reclaimed gray water from the home. Currently, research and development is under way to move away from the city resource and use water collected from roof runoff and gray water.

One of the principal objectives of the SRL is to reach a level of complete heating independence down to -25°F. While inside temperatures would hardly be balmy in the greenhouse, plants would still be safe from freezing. Work still needs to be done in this area, as during the winter of 2013, before the greenhouse was in full operation, the internal air temperature dropped to 34°F when the outside temperature plummeted to -16°F.

What’s Cookin’ in the Lab?

At the lab, we are currently testing a simple, low-cost hot water collector to boost the amount of passive solar energy that’s being stored in the 300-gallon thermomass water tanks. Instead of using rigid copper pipe in the collector, we are incorporating cross-linked polyethylene tubing, commonly called PEX or XLPE, which is used frequently in domestic home water systems.

greenhouse water battery bank

The advantage of using PEX is greatly reduced cost, as much as 75 percent, over the use of copper. Working with PEX is much less labor intensive than working with copper, and should the system ever freeze, copper will rupture whereas PEX is much less vulnerable. On the downside, PEX does not as effectively transfer heat from the sun into the water that is circulating through the system as does copper. When exposed to sunlight, PEX piping can degrade. Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light in sunlight causes the internal molecular structure of PEX to break down. To counteract this effect, the UV is being filtered out in our collectors before coming into contact with the tubing.

The PEX hot water collector is basically a loop of continuous tubing, perhaps 100 feet long, snaking through a long, shallow, rectangular box painted black and covered with a sheet of polycarbonate. The PEX is connected to a low-speed 200 GPH pump submerged in the thermomass storage water tank. As the water circulates through the loops, it’s heated by the sun. The pump is controlled by a thermostatic sensor located in the solar collector. The end result is that the water in the tank stores the additional heat that, in turn, is released back into the greenhouse as needed.

PEX Tubing Solar Collectors Test

It was decided that a full-scale test of the collector would be conducted in the winter of 2014-15. For the purpose of this test, 2 of the 4 thermomass storage tanks in the greenhouse were selected. Tank A would act as the control for the test. It would only receive its heat by passive solar collection from sunlight passing into the greenhouse alone, whereas tank B would be heated both by passive solar energy (like tank A) and by the PEX solar collector.

November and December 2014 Collector Test Alpha Results Summary

greenhouse inside 1

In November 2014, the PEX solar panel added 523,168 BTU’s (British Thermal Units) to test tank B. This energy was released back into the greenhouse in the form of radiant heat.

During the month, there were 6 days of fully overcast skies, and the PEX collector was inoperable during this period. Without the sun to power the collector or provide passive heating to the thermomass heat storage test tank B, the temperature dropped from a daily low on November 10, 2014, of 73.9°F to 62.6°F by November 13. The temperature of control test tank A dropped from 62.6°F to 60.2°F over the same period. With nighttime outside air temperatures at -2.9°F, the greenhouse temperature at the ground level dropped from 54.7°F to 39.7°F.

In the calculation of the energy used in the operation of the active solar collector inside the greenhouse during the November Collector Test Alpha, the International Standard SI unit of energy is the joule and was used for this purpose. However, as the recording instrumentation within the greenhouse is only able report energy consumption in wattage, it became necessary to collect the data in wattage before converting it into joules. One kilowatt hour is equal to 3.6 megajoules, which is the amount of energy if work is done at an average rate of 1,000 watts for 1 hour. This is reflected in the formula below:

kW . h=(3600s) [kW]=3600 [s] [ks/s] = 3600kJ=3.6MJ

greenhouse inside 2

The pump that circulates the water through the collector into the test tank consumes 9 watts of power. At this rate, it would take the pump 111.11 hours of operation to consume 1 kilowatt of power. At present, the daily run time is not being collected for the pump; but based on observations, on sunny days, the pump runs for about 6 continuous hours.

During the month of November, the pump ran on 27 of 30 days. Assuming that it ran 6 hours daily, the energy used would be 1.458 kWh or 5.248MJ (megajoules). The price of energy supplied by the local utility is at the rate of 15 cents per kilowatt hour. The cost to operate the pump for this 27-day period was a total of 22 cents.

In December, the total BTUs added to the greenhouse was slightly less than in November at 521,417. This is not surprising, as there were a number of factors that played into this total:

  • First, December had 10 overcast days while November had only 6.
  • December has fewer hours per day of daylight than does November as it’s closer to the winter solstice, the shortest day of the year.
  • In addition, the average daily outside temperatures are much lower in December than in November. The average for November was 51.7°F high and 24.7°F low. In December, the average high was 45.7°F with an average low of 19.1°F.

On the last 2 days of December 2014, the outside temperature bottomed out at -12.9°F on December 30 and at -15.0°F on December 31 under gray, sunless skies. The inside temperature of the greenhouse under these harsh condition dropped dangerously close to freezing with an overnight low of 32.6°F.

Conclusion of Test Alpha

While the PEX solar collector that was under observation collected more than 1 million BTUs during the 2 full months of Collector Test Alpha, even with the help of a second PEX collector this was not enough additional energy to protect the greenhouse from freezing when faced with a combination of nighttime temperatures below -15°F and continuous gray, overcast skies for 2 days or longer.

The long-term goal is to have the greenhouse be able to maintain inside nighttime temperatures no lower than 40°F when outside nighttime temperatures reach the -25°F range combined with 2 days of overcast, sunless skies. It’s clear that modification will need to be made in future tests if the overall objective is to be reached.

greenhouse tomoato

Test Alpha-Beta

Test Alpha-Beta was a continuation of Test Alpha that included all the data for the winter season 2014-15, starting October 22, 2014, and concluding on March 31, 2015. During this period test, Tank B collected 2,650,386.6 more BTUs of heat than control tank A.

2.6 million BTUs is a significant amount of energy, and it was produced at a very low overall cost. It’s estimated that the power to run the pump during the 161 days of the research project cost about $1.60, meaning that 16,564 BTUs were generated for each penny spent. The average daily BTUs generated by the collector was 17,225.1

For those of you who are number freaks like me, I would be glad to send you a PDF file with the data. Just drop me an e-mail at:

Russel the Mad Scientist SoaringRavenLab at gmail dot com

greenhsoue at night lit up

Russel Erganbright submitted this article as part of The Grow Network’s 2015 Writing Contest. It was originally published on May 7, 2015. Thank you, Russel!

(Visited 4,715 times, 1 visits today)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Categorised in: , , , , ,

This post was written by Writing Contest Entry


  • Andy UK-England says:

    We need more people and more information like this.
    This has got to be one of the best articles iv read, Maybe even the best one.

    1. We do need more like this Andy! Love what Russel is doing and its what this [Grow] Network is all about.

    2. Marjory Wildcraft says:

      Andy – I totally agree! This project completely rocks!

  • Bets says:

    Even the earliest ‘failed’ would be great for South Arkansas!

  • James says:

    why don’t you try a 24′ x 3′ x 2′ run of wood chips and let it turn into mulch..that will get hot enough to burn your skin and will likely provide all the heat you need. Having a good radian barrier as the base mght make it even more effective

    1. James, I’ve always wondered about the efficiency of heating via compost. How many BTU’s does it throw off?

      Ditto for chickens and rabbits – could we heat greenhouses using small livestock?

  • MARILYN says:

    “For those of you that are number freaks like me, I would be glad to send you a pdf file with the data.” PLEASE! And thank you!

    1. Marilyn, you’ll need to send Russel an email. His address is at teh end of the post – just insert the @ sign and . as needed.

  • T Stone says:

    Very little money but very interested in solar heat and electricity. T Stone

  • Willie says:

    I’m building an experimental heated raised bed in my 16×32 greenhouse. The heated portion of the bed is about 18×5. I put 2″ thick insulation first then old metal roof panels and laid several rows of 3/4″ PVC piping down. I will fill the bed with soil and plan to build a solar heating panel with PVC as well to connect it to the pipe loop underneath the bed. A small fountain pump then circulates glycol through the system. A short hoop structure then on top of the bed hopefully extends my Upstate NY growing season.

  • Jose L says:

    I live in Florida so a green house will generate too much heat and most likely kill everything inside it. The problem I have here is sand since Florida is just an overgrown sandbar. So I’m trying an idea I found in the last summit series about using hay to add organic matter to the soil (sand) and get rid of weeds. I’ll let you know how this works out.

  • dbass says:

    Very interesting! I live in Southeast Idaho at 6200 feet-today is March 22 and we still have a foot of snow! We want to build a greenhouse and have been looking into different plans. Good information!

  • Cherlynn says:

    Several years ago I helped one of my Amish neighbors install a Bio Mass heater with tubes running through the grow beds before going out. It ran on wood chips. They have now gotten 12 of these big green houses going and grow tomatoes, melons and all kinds of goodies all year long filling contracts with a grocery chain on our area. They use less than a half cord of wood each winter to heat all their green houses and the barn and house. I am trying to get my husband to build me a small green house like this attached to the south side of our home. We live on the Missouri /Iowa border and our winters can be pretty brutal.

    1. Marjory Wildcraft says:

      Wow Cherlynn, taht Amish installation sounds amazing. I would love to have them write up an article about what they have done.
      And aren’t husbadns great? Mine built me a hoop house, and right now he is buidling me a chicken coop. Oh, he is also crating a presenation on how to build the coop at the upcomein Home Medicien Summit I am hosting in mid May. Stay tuned!

    2. Carl Boehm says:

      Would love to know some more information about this … Was it similar to a rocket stove or something different. The Amish have a lot of great ways to do things but are pretty silent about things because of the lifestyle. Not a bad thing as they will share but you have to be there … Carl

  • Mar Bly says:

    Love it! I am not able to do a lot any more, but retired scientist and looking for more and more ways to not use electricity. I have solar panels hooked to grid.
    I am wondering when you got those tomatoes. I found that best to stick with greens in the winter because the more summer plants do not fruit. The sun is just too weak and not enough hours. I am in Northern East TN and we have weather that goes up and down frequently. I am now starting a lot of plants and my cabbage plants already have heads on them and even though we had a little snow two days ago, my outside onions and other things are going good already.

    I only buy solar now if I can for the farm parts of my living space. I have a home with wood stove, but difficult for me to lift the wood.

    I am a retired college professor and taught scientific psychology and guided my students through research projects from sophomores to Ph.D.s.

    Just loved your carefully noted journey to solar heat for your greenhouse. I am no longer good at keeping a journal of what I have accomplished. So kudos to you !

    One note for all of Marjorie’s people – When I got rid of DISH, I discovered that the receivers cost 10 – 20 dollars/month in electricity. I am trying to get as much as possible off of the electric bill. I still have to pay a little in the winter with my solar panels on overcast days.

    Thank you for sharing,

  • Riesah says:

    I’ve wanted a greenhouse for years, but we live in SW Alberta, just east of the Rockies, where the prairies meet the mountains. We get high wind gusts now throughout the year and had a blow in late Oct. at 143 kph. Greenhouses don’t fare well unless very well surrounded by a wind
    break and securely into concrete, as my yurt is (6-8 feet down to the bedrock). Everything I’ve
    read about extending the growing season has to meet such stiff standards for wind survival. Also, our ground is quite stoney. I’d sure welcome any ideas on how to extend our season economically and with a modicum of hard physical work as we are both “older”. Thanks,

    1. JakeMartin says:

      I read a recent article about a guy, also in Colorado/Nebraska, who grow tropicals (citrus, bananas, etc.) in his greenhouse. His greenhouse is dug around 4 feet deep with coils of the black plastic pipe buried deeper and used to transfer the 55 degree ground temperature to the greenhouse. The height of the greenhouse above ground is maybe 4 or 5 feet tall. If I can find it I’ll post it. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=citrus+colorado+greenhouse, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD_3_gsgsnk

      1. habbhabb says:

        I think you are talking about Russ Finch. Check out greenhouseinthesnow.com or there’s a video if you scroll down on https://greenhouseinthesnow.com/book-a-tour

  • suzanne197 says:

    There will come a time soon when you will regret calling yourself a “Mad Scientist”, for reasons I will make obvious. I would recommend instead call yourself a “Genius Scientist”. Mad Scientists are people who twist science and/or commit science fraud, for agendas to ultimately hurt and kill other people. This is what is going on in with the U.N.’s W.H.O.’s organization, in collusion with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, in order to impose their agenda on the world, of depopulation by over 90%, via artificially engineered famines (food grid collapse), diseases, and weaponized vaccines — all published for you to see on their websites. Cruelty and callousness toward other human beings have always been the marks of “Mad Scientists”. It was Hollywood who made them “cute”. Well, real “Mad Scientists” aren’t “cute”. I run the website MadScientists.Exposed, tracking these kinds of evil people and their tricks. Mine is not the only one. Real Mad Scientists, who want to end humanity, are the reason we’re all prepping anyway, no?

    It’s your choice, but I suggest calling yourself a “Genius Scientist”.

    Thank you for your wonderful green house ideas 🙂

  • Joanna Newcomer says:

    This is amazing and in my neck of the woods too! Very inspiring!

  • Tom says:

    Over 30 years ago I knew someone who was heating his above ground pool in Denver Colorado area using black garden hoses. Cheaper than PEX and great at absorbing heat. Downside is the water is very toxic after being heated repeatedly in the hose, so you wouldn’t want to put it in anything that you would ever eat

  • Christina Pearson says:

    For those folks in more extreme climates of wind and cold, check out the walipini, an underground greenhouse used in the brutal steppes of Peru, where entire villages are attempting to grow human and livestock feed underground! I’m currently working on my zone 4a-with-lots-of-wind design now with the intent of primarily growing winter greens

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.