Marjory Reviews the “Survival Still”

Years ago I heard about this guy, Glenn Meder, who was working on developing a simple, inexpensive way to distill water in an emergency situation.

This made so much sense to me that I immediately sent Glenn a contribution of $100 to help his research along . . .

. . . Because one of the biggest things we Americans take for granted is clean drinking water.

(By the way, Glenn succeeded in developing his Survival Still. For more details, you can go ahead and click here.) 

Yeah, we complain about fluoride, or too much chlorine, and they are issues. But those problems are nothing compared to the vast majority of humans on this planet who have to work very hard to get even a glass of clean water.

If you ever get to hear that interview I did with Fernando Aguire (the guy who survived the Argentinian collapse), he tells a fascinating story of how quickly municipal water sanitation deteriorated in Buenos Aires. When the people didn’t have money to pay their water bills, maintenance fell by the wayside. Water quality plummeted. It led to an unprecedented amount of disease in what used to be a first-world city.

Fernando said it was shocking how quickly the public water systems deteriorated.

Thankfully, there are many ways to purify water. The best, by far, is distillation. So a simple, rugged water-distillation unit could be a lifesaver in any kind of emergency.

Of course, I wanted to see this get developed and made commercially available! So I was really excited when Glenn told me the still was ready.

Review of the Survival Still Workshop

Glenn has a very informative online workshop that teaches you the Red Cross recommendations for purifying water. I really liked Glenn’s simple and easy-to-understand explanations.

Glenn goes into detail about the three water-purification methods the Red Cross recommends:

  1. Chlorine
  2. Boiling
  3. Distillation

The best part of the workshop is how Glenn spends a lot of time explaining why the Red Cross makes the recommendations they do. Lots of great insights there.

Anyway, after watching the workshop I felt that, yes, I really had a much greater understanding of the most significant dangers and of the best methods for treatment.

I highly recommend watching the online workshop.

Unpacking the Survival Still

The box came, and as I unpacked it, I was impressed with the sturdiness of the still components. Yup, these would last a very long time.

I got the complete package that includes the two pots (you can opt for simply buying the still alone without the two pots). These two pots are also stainless steel and adequate for use on a controlled fire such as the gas stove or grill I would use.

I know from experience cooking on open wood fires that the thinness of the lower pot provided would not work well at all on an open wood fire, or even on coals. Almost all modern cookware is so thin that it isn’t useful for rugged outdoor cooking. In a grid-down situation, wood fires are likely to be the method of choice for cooking.

Since this still needs it, you should plan on having a source of propane or other fuel that provides a stable, controllable heat.

And, my recommendation is to stock up on cast iron cookware, which cooks well in crude heating/fire situations.

Anyway, pots aside, the still is really sturdy.

Also in the box were the directions. And, as promised, the five sets of laminated Red Cross pamphlets.

I am not much of a directions reader and it looked to be mostly full of warnings that seemed to contradict operating it. So I tossed that aside.  (Turns out, the directions say you should only use this system on a controlled heat source—which puts open fires or coals out of the question. Just be prepared for that when the grid goes down.)

Testing Operation of the Survival Still

When I tested the Survival Still, it was the end of the summer and my family had given up on the pool quite a while before, so the water looked perfect for testing out the still.

It was seriously yucky. Dark brown. Stuff floating on top. Including dead insects . . . .

As recommended, I scooped out enough for both the lower pot and the top pot.

I first tested the system on my stove in the kitchen, but it didn’t produce anything. My husband and I scratched our heads, and we thought that perhaps it needed more heat? Glenn had mentioned in the webinar about “pushing it” and getting production to more than a quart per hour. Did “pushing it” mean using more heat?

Besides, there was some kind of warning about “don’t do this indoors” in the instructions that I had tossed aside.

So I got out the grill on the patio, and I went through the entire process again.

Here  is what I did:

  1. First, I let the water in the lower pot come to a rolling boil.
  2. Then I put on the splash guard.
  3. Next, I put the collector on top of the splash guard.
  4. And topped it all off with the cooling pot.
  5. Then we let ‘er rip for almost an hour and a half.  And we got . . . nothing. Nada.

What went wrong?

We did see steam coming out of the “straw,” but no water dripping out. We figured it wasn’t condensing.

I tried it again (with new cool water in the top). In the middle of the process, I swapped out the top pot with cooler water (the top gets surprisingly hot). This was to try to help the condensation.

But still, nothing.

So, you’ve no doubt heard the saying, “When all else fails, read the directions.”

Well, reluctantly, I did. But I couldn’t really find any help there.

Was it too hot?

What went wrong?

Spending some more time trying to troubleshoot the operation, I noticed that some steam was coming out of the junction where the straw meets up with the collector.

I guess I didn’t have it set tightly enough.

And wow, once I got it set correctly, the still just purred along very nicely. Beautiful, clean distilled water came out of the straw.

And yes, I drank a glass full of the distilled water. It tasted a bit flat, but was otherwise fine.

So the big lesson here is, always test your equipment before you need it.

If I had this problem under the duress of a real emergency, it wouldn’t have been any fun at all.

Recommendation For The Survival Still

Overall, this is a really great product for emergency water distillation. And distillation, by far, is the best option when you are concerned about getting clean water.

The still is well constructed and well designed. It is rugged. The laminated copies of the Red Cross recommendations that come with the set are really great to have on hand and to share as Glenn recommends.

Really, there are only two drawbacks to keep in mind with this product:

  1. You’ll need to have either appropriate cookware, or an appropriate heat source to correctly operate the still. In a grid-down situation, that means having your own supply of propane or an easily controlled heat source (maybe a rocket stove?), or having heavy enough cookware (like cast iron) to heat water over the more unstable heat of coals or a wood fire.
  2. The Survival Still only produces about a quart of clean water per hour. And the still does need to be watched and tended. So this would be someone’s job for most of the day to make enough water for a family of four to drink.

I do highly recommend the Survival Still as an emergency backup method for turning almost any kind of nasty water into safe drinking water.


(This review was originally published on October 7, 2014. It was updated before republication.)

(Visited 1,762 times, 1 visits today)
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Categorised in: , , ,

This post was written by Marjory Wildcraft


  • Carol says:

    Looks like you need a huge amount of propane in storage to get enough water daily for survival. Ever done the math on this? Esp if needing the stove for other cooking too. I live in an apt building so would be testing the fire code to store any propane. Any suggestions for a city dweller in apt rental building? Thanks for what you do.

    1. Michael Ford says:

      Good question Carol – In my “go box” I keep a simple, light backpacking grill. It’s made of heavy gauge steel wire and it folds up nicely. I have it so that I can heat food & water without putting my light cookware directly on the coals of a wood fire. The weight of the still plus water might be too much for my little grid/grill, but with a little reinforcement from some bricks or rocks, I think it would work to keep the still separated from the fire. That’s one thought. In a city, you could look for a barbecue grill with a more stable structure.

      I think propane would be great to have when using the Survival Still to weather a “small storm” like a local natural disaster. For a real, extended grid-down situation – you’re probably going to switch to wood fires as soon as possible. Hope that’s helpful. Happy prepping! Michael

  • Bill says:

    Have you thought about doing a review of a solar still? It sure would be nice to leave something like this unattended and without having to use a lot of propane.

  • Blackthorn says:

    I bought one of these at the end of 2016. It took longer than expected to ship, get tracking info and arrive but finally did in a bit over 3 weeks. Of course I immediately tested it on our indoor kitchen gas stove and found, like Marjorie did, it takes over an hour to produce a quart. I’m trying to imagine having to stoke a wood fire to generate enough heat to get a usable amount of clean water from this setup and it’s not promising. I think I bought this unit too soon and without seeing what else is out there. It’s quite expensive and I’m pretty disappointed it doesn’t include a top without an additional charge. Also like Marjorie says, it’s pretty thin metal and if you have to use it on a wood fire it’s not going to last long. All in all I can’t recommend this unit at all, especially at over $300. Pity, really.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.